We measure the rain with science: we use information sources are validated by the top scientific institutions in the world, quality and reliable

With the systems of assessment that we use in RainMaker® we evaluate each operation of stimulation of rainfall by combining satellite data, weather radar, and other sources of qualitative relevant that enable us to provide reliable results and verifiable.

Forecast (AIRS – NASA)


AIRS/NASA Officer

https://www.rainmaker.ooo/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Temp_Trends5.mp4

Actual measurement (IMERG/GPM)


GPM/IMERG Official

https://www.rainmaker.ooo/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/imergert_1080p_30.mp4

Comparison and Delta efficiency

Step 1

Area impaco

We define a surface area of evaluation (e.g. a river basin or agricultural area).

Step 2

Calculation

We estimate the rain predicted for AIRS and the rain measured by IMERG on that same surface.

Step 3

Control

We take a control area (not sown) to rule out natural variations.

Step 4

Effect

The difference obtained is the delta of efficiency of precipitation, indicator of the positive effect of cloud seeding.

📊 The scientific basis

TITAN: when there are available radar

When there is a Doppler radar in operation, we use TITAN (Thunderstorm Identification, Tracking, Analysis and Nowcasting):

🌱 We supplemented with qualitative indicators

To strengthen the reliability, we add variables hints that show the impact on the territory:

El Sistema de Evaluación RainMaker® garantiza que los resultados no solo se perciban, sino que se midan, documenten y validen con herramientas de nivel internacional.
“Donde otros ven solo lluvia, nosotros vemos datos, evidencia y resultados medibles.”